None Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words - 13

None - Essay Example The third factor as seen in the movie, appeal to pity takes place when an individual tries to endorse a conclusion by evoking sympathy or pity from the listener or reader (Damer 19). From the movie, twelve angry men; characteristics of critical thinking are diverse. Critical thinking process entails a deep thought process that requires a person to remain attentive to the issue at hand by focusing on the process from argumentation to summary. A person needs to exercise self-reflection so that they question and test their own thinking ability or process. Any form of critical thinking aims to tackle the issue at hand and remains attentive to a specific topic. In turn, the process focuses on identifying biases, strengths, weaknesses, personal opinion, and their influence on concepts or ideas (Damer 32). After careful evaluation of the issues, an individual gives his or her perception about what they think. Therefore, features of critical thinking

Entrepreneurial Self Reflective Analysis Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

Entrepreneurial Self Reflective Analysis - Essay Example The essay presents a self-reflection analysis done by the researcher and based on the GET2 test while providing any contradicting or supportive arguments based on previous encounters. The overall result of the test that are presented in the essay also challenges the ability of the researcher to develop innovative ideas. The researcher considers this assumption both wrong and highly prejudiced. Different people have different abilities and ideas. It is explained that since we all have a different set of abilities and personal characteristics, the researcher believes the test does not give an excellent analysis regarding his overall creativity. The researcher then councluds that these test results also seem to contradict each other seeing that the researcher considers his risks suggesting that he prefers taking calculated moves. An example of a contradictory review is the idea that the researcher prefers giving orders and also being the team leader. The same test results also state tha t the researcher would be well suited in an intrapreneurship letting someone take charge and engage in risky activities. If the two results are by chance considered to be factual, then the researcher would also have a strong desire to lead any partner, and that would translate to taking a higher risk than them. According to the GET2 test, the researcher have an overall score of 63 percent that implies he is likely to have strengths in various enterprising characteristics and could also be enterprising in some contexts.